top of page

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!


By what authority do Maori groups impose restrictions on the rest of the community?

The other day, I noticed a report in the media that Far North hapu have imposed a rahui on taking scallops from the Whangaroa Harbor. The ban on taking scallops extended across the whole harbour, and was expected to last three years.

Another Maori tribe imposed a similar ban on taking shell-fish in parts of the Coromandel last year.

After the serious loss of life caused by the eruption of White Island more than a year ago, yet another tribe placed a rahui on the Whakatane waterfront, and erected a temporary barrier stopping access to it.

A few years ago, a tribe placed a rahui on parts of the Waitakeres to help protect kauri trees from a disease.

When somebody loses their life in a river, or at a beach, it is common to see a tribe declare a rahui over the relevant body of water.

Does the rest of the community just abide by those restrictions out of goodwill? It seems bizarre to have a government department formally charged with conserving our natural resources while simultaneously allowing small tribes to invent their own rules and require the rest of the community to abide by them.

2,020 views9 comments
bottom of page