top of page

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!


CHRIS TROTTER: The revolution has begun

IF NEW ZEALAND’S educational curriculum was dedicated to condemning capitalism and uplifting the working class, would that signal a revolution? If working-class culture was elevated above the cultural achievements of the upper and middle classes, would that signal a revolution? If representatives of the trade unions exercised a decisive influence over the editorial direction of the news media and the content of university courses, would that signal a revolution?

Of course it would.

Nearly forty years ago, as the newly-elected Fourth Labour Government was pursuing its nuclear-free agenda, organising women’s forums, and preparing to destroy the achievements of the First, Second and Third Labour Governments, a handful of young trade unionists – Labour Party members all – lobbied the then Minister of Labour, Stan Rodger, for a daily bulletin of trade union news on Radio New Zealand.

Way back in 1984, New Zealanders could keep abreast of what was happening on New Zealand’s farms by tuning-in to “Rural News” Or, keep up with the machinations of industry and finance by listening to “Business News”. There was even a weekly programme called “Focus on Politics”. But, the only time New Zealanders ever got to hear about what was happening in the country’s factories, warehouses, offices and shops was when workers went out on strike.

“So, how about it, Stan, why not a daily, or weekly, round-up of news about the issues confronting working-class New Zealanders?” Now to give Stan Rodger his due, he gave us a fair hearing. Indeed, I think he was personally quite excited by the idea, because, eventually, a short series of programmes entitled “Working Life” did make it to air. But a daily round-up of news from the perspective of those working on the factory floor, or driving a truck, or standing at the check-out counter? Not a chance.

Such a programme would have indicated a significant shift in social and economic power in the direction of working people. But, as we all know, the people running the Fourth Labour Government (not all of whom were democratically-elected politicians) were committed to shifting social and economic power in precisely the opposite direction – towards the bankers and the bosses. That’s why there was a vast expansion in the coverage of business affairs on Radio New Zealand – and right across the news media. That’s why, in just a few years, the ideology of neoliberalism permeated the whole of New Zealand society. There had definitely been a revolution – but not by the workers.

New Zealand is currently living through another top-down revolution. Though far from complete, it has already captured control of the commanding heights of the public service, the schools and universities, the funding mechanisms of cultural production, and big chunks of the mainstream news media.

The ideology driving this revolution is not neoliberalism, it’s ethnonationalism. A potent amalgam of indigenous mysticism and neo-tribal capitalism has captured the imagination of the professional and managerial class and is relying on the latter’s administrative power and influence to drive through a revolutionary transformation of New Zealand society under the battle-flags of “indigenisation” and “decolonisation”. The glue which holds this alliance of Māori and Non-Māori elites together is Pakeha guilt.

The origins of the present ethnonationalist revolution may be traced back to the early 1980s – specifically the 1981 Springbok Tour. A very large and well-organised anti-racist movement against the Apartheid system in South Africa took to the streets to protest the presence in New Zealand of the Springbok rugby team. There they encountered not only the brutal forces of the state, but a vast number of New Zealanders who were not in the least bit shamed or shifted by the charges of racism hurled at them by the protesters. The Springbok Tour thus revealed a deep divide in New Zealand society, leaving many of the protesters feeling like strangers in their own land.

The modern Māori nationalist movement, which had taken form during the 1970s, was quick to draw a large number of these alienated liberal Pakeha into its orbit. Using tactics developed by radical social reformers in the United States, Māori activists accused the Springbok Tour protesters of caring more about Apartheid in South Africa than they did about the racism in their own country. “Learn your own history! Read about the violence done to Māori and the confiscation of their lands! Stop going on about racism in the abstract and pay heed to those who understand it from bitter personal experience! Surrender your privilege!”

It worked. The nationalist activists had created a movement towards “Māori Sovereignty” in which revolutionary Māori would lead, and guilty Pakeha would follow. Not that these guilty Pakeha represented anything like a majority of Non-Māori New Zealanders, far from it, but they did constitute a significant percentage of the well-educated and credentialed members of the Professional-Managerial Class – and that would be enough. The Guilty Pakeha’s “long march through the institutions” had begun.

And what a very long march it has been, but, 40 years after it began, the champions and fellow-travellers of the Māori nationalist movement can look back upon some stunning successes.

Fearing that the nationalists were about to unleash a mass movement of the most marginalised Māori against the “Settler State” – fears stoked by reports of Māori nationalists being feted in revolutionary Libya and Cuba – the Crown initiated the Treaty Settlement Process with Iwi Māori. Informed by President of the New Zealand Court of Appeal, Robin Cooke’s, landmark 1987 reinterpretation of the Treaty of Waitangi’s meaning and purpose, this process brought into being the Iwi-based corporations that gave birth to the phenomenon Elizabeth Rata calls “neo-tribal capitalism”. The sons and daughters of the original Māori nationalists now have the resources they need to carry their parents’ dream to fruition.

Only one more strategic victory is required to complete the Māori nationalist revolution: Pakeha pride in their past and in their culture has to be undermined. The men and women once celebrated as nation-builders have to be recast as colonial oppressors. The country famed for being “the social laboratory of the world” has to be re-presented as just another sordid collection of white supremacist, treaty-breaking, killers and thieves.

Māori, too, are in need of a complete makeover: from slave-owning warrior-cannibals, to peace-loving caretakers of Te Ao Māori – a world to which they are bound by deep and mystical bonds. Inheritors of a culture that sanctioned genocidal conquest and environmental destruction, how can the Pakeha hope to lead Aotearoa towards a just future? As in the 1980s, the Twenty-First Century journey requires revolutionary Māori to lead, and guilty Pakeha to follow. And those guilty Pakeha in a position to make it happen appear only too happy to oblige.

Which is why, in March 2023, New Zealand has an educational curriculum dedicated to condemning colonisation and uplifting the indigenous Māori. Why Māori cultural traditions and ways of knowing are elevated above the achievements of Western culture and science. Why representatives of local iwi and hapu wield decisive influence over private and public development plans, as well as the credo and content of media reporting and university courses.

The Māori nationalist revolution is not yet complete – but it has, most certainly, begun.

Chris Trotter blogs at Bowalley Road

4,276 views110 comments

110 Σχόλια

Άγνωστο μέλος
15 Μαρ 2023

What are you talking about, Chris? I had two ribs broken by a Red Squad thug's long baton -- as I was running away from him -- in the 1981 Springbok protests against racism IN SOUTH AFRICA, where I have never even been. And there is NO WAY I'm going to put up with institutionalised racism in my own country now.

I have never been into white middle-class guilt. I just don't think racism should be a thing. So I am disgusted that it's now been deemed advantageous to be "Maori" (whatever that means).

Μου αρέσει
Άγνωστο μέλος
16 Μαρ 2023
Απάντηση σε

Ironic isn't it. Many of the people that rightly protested at the 1981 tour are responsible for the division we currently find in today's society. The very people that fought against apartheid now actively promote it under a guise of co governance.

Been equal in new Zealand has always been possible, regardless of race, religion, ethnicity or origin.

True equity and equality in new Zealand is already here, and to promote a so called subjugated race as superior to their countrymen is simply apartheid. To gift automatic positions on boards based on race is separatist and dangerously inflammatory.

Think about it .

Love your contribution.


Μου αρέσει

Άγνωστο μέλος
14 Μαρ 2023

I am deeply guilty, of not giving a shit what happened 150 years ago, I feel a little guilty I wasnt here then with the knowledge I have now, what treaty you say, keep shooting boys. Take a good look at South Africa today, I see the prime minister declared over half a million dollars missing from the coffers and lo and behold just that amount strangely turned up in a sofa in his pool room, he was found not guilty, ring a bell. Feel guilty? Like hell

Μου αρέσει

Άγνωστο μέλος
11 Μαρ 2023

I'm not sure where you get the impression that New Zealand has an educational curriculum dedicated to condemning colonisation and uplifting the indigenous Māori.

The curriculum says that learning about Aotearoa New Zealand’s histories helps students understand different perspectives and experiences, which grows empathy and builds connections between people. It mentions nothing about dividing them which is what is implied from the tone of your posting.

It is true that the curriculum doesn't shy away from discussing the negative impact of colonisation on Maori history, but it is not condemning colonisation, just recognising the facts as they were. Similarly Māori cultural traditions and ways of knowing are not elevated above the achievements of Western culture and science, they are discussed…

Μου αρέσει
Άγνωστο μέλος
12 Μαρ 2023
Απάντηση σε

Surely you jest? But tell me this, did Maori cede sovereignty?

Μου αρέσει

Άγνωστο μέλος
10 Μαρ 2023

The last three posts (charlie.baycroft. then donaldk, then charlie.baycroft ) say it all.

Forget the likes of the Bowalley bullshit that flows nonstop from the pinko class... out to protect their own.

NZ needs to change its political system entirely. And it certainly does if it wants a future away from the last 50 years of evolved corruption and institutionalized crap.

Μου αρέσει

Άγνωστο μέλος
09 Μαρ 2023

I see so many people complaining about what is wrong with our government and very few suggesting how to fix what is wrong. Our political system is supposed to enable the majority of the people to elect/hire representatives who will work for their benefit and not interfere with their lives. The elected representatives are supposed to oversee the management of government enterprises so that public money is spent wisely and cost effectively. What things should "the government" be manging? 1. Our national sovereignty. Protecting our borders, communal property and natural resources from foreign interferrence and exploitation. 2. Infrastructure and public works. 3. Law and order. Protecting law abiding citizens from criminals that harm them and their property. 4. Education. Providing all children with the necessary knowledge and…

Μου αρέσει
Άγνωστο μέλος
14 Μαρ 2023
Απάντηση σε


you left off the last word of the phrase 🤣

Μου αρέσει
bottom of page