top of page

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

Search

DON BRASH: The new government has one helluva a task in front of it: Compulsory indoctrination is unworthy of professional bodies

The other day, I became aware of another example of the way in which the last Government tried to embed its own narrow interpretation of the Treaty of Waitangi into every aspect of New Zealand life.

 

This one involves the Real Estate Authority.  Like many similar bodies, it encourages its authorized agents to get regular updates about the laws and regulations affecting their profession.  In this case, real estate agents are required to do 10 hours of study on a variety of issues, theoretically relevant to the real estate industry. 

 

I say “theoretically relevant” because in 2023 15% of the 10 hours of courses – or 1.5 hours – was required to be about Maori culture and language, and indoctrination of the view that what the Treaty of Waitangi really provided was not the cession of sovereignty to the Crown (the majority consensus for most of our history) but rather a partnership between Maori chiefs and Governor Hobson.  This 1.5 hour programme was to be provided and the agents assessed by a politically-motivated Maori group from the Bay of Plenty area.

 

A distant cousin of mine objected to this political indoctrination.  She has been a real estate agent for several decades, operating in recent years in some of the eastern suburbs of Auckland.  She grew up among Maori and for some years taught in a predominantly Maori school.  She has some ability in te reo having studied for and passed School Certificate Maori and expanded upon her knowledge since.   She considers many Maori individuals to be both friends and inspiration and is generally supportive of Maori culture.

 

But she strongly objected to having to be indoctrinated in a narrow – and, she and I both believe, a fundamentally incorrect – view of what the Treaty of Waitangi provided. Parts of the course were also in complete conflict with her ethical and religious convictions, so she sought an exemption on conscientious grounds from having to undertake that part of the programme.  That exemption has been denied for no obvious reason, and with effect from 1 January 2024 her licence to practise as a real estate agent will be cancelled – and be unable to be renewed for five years – unless her appeal against this ruling is upheld.  And this despite the fact that the Treaty of Waitangi programme will no longer be mandatory from 1 January 2024.

 

Since having this issue drawn to my attention, I have watched an interview on the Platform between Sean Plunket and David Seymour discussing exactly this kind of indoctrination, now very widespread across a great many professions and occupations.  As David Seymour remarked in that March 2023 interview, this not only involves a great deal of time and bureaucracy, with lots of people bogged down in doing “studies” which have absolutely minimal or no relevance to their occupation, it also inculcates an interpretation of the Treaty which is totally inconsistent with any concept of democracy where all citizens are equal before the law.

 

It is outrageous stuff, and all New Zealanders who want our society to be a democracy need to push the Government to stomp on it without delay.

 

Don Brash

27 December 2023

 

6,972 views339 comments

339 Comments


What an appalling manifestation of indoctrination. How would Maori feel if they were indoctrinated and had to accept English political structures, language, philosophies and opinions in order to obtain employment?

Like
Replying to

Reality.

Like

Bert
Dec 31, 2023

Expecting the path already laid to be stomped on by the present coalition Government is a big ask (I suspect impossible in reality) when considering its administration under National signed NZ up to the the entire United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), while the objectives and the ends sought under UNDRIP (unreported by media) are well underway already via ancillary government processes and legislation already fashioned and activated under a veil of total reliance on the declaration and its bias interpretation by a select few?


The system has been staked with mainstream media (MSM) left leaning brains that believe in, and are ego driven by phrases that the last government spouted out, such as "inclusion". "diversity",…


Like

Grant Duncan
Grant Duncan
Dec 30, 2023

This should go to the

Like
Replying to

Me too ?????

Like

Andromeda
Dec 30, 2023

@fiona


Who would have thought competent structural engineering had anything to do with identifying as Maori or seeing the world through the Maori lens (whatever that is)? But Labour’s lot got into them as well - they too are required to undergo indoctrination/assessment. Check out the BS from Te Ao Rangahau (Engineering NZ!).


When an objective, rational science, based on established principles, is viewed through an emotional, subjective, feelings, and racial based lens, the outcomes produced will be unpredictable and unreliable.


We occasionally have heard or said, when someone is taking something personally or making it about themselves "it is not (all) about you", applies here. The focus and emphasis with science and/or engineering is about the science and/or engineering,…


Edited
Like
BikeBoy
Jan 07
Replying to

And ends in bullshit. Everyone knows they’re just going along to get along.

Like

hlphil
Dec 30, 2023

If things Maori are so beneficial and providential then sensible people would wish to access them and develop the advantages voluntarily. There would be no need for coercion. As this does not appear to be the case any "requirement" is criminal, just as forcing intelligent folk to be injected with the Pfizzer which has been demonstrated to be nothing more than a placebo. Part-Maori and non-Maori are all just human. Treat everyone as you wish to be treated. Colour-blndness is a virtue in this context. Everyone would get along if all this revisionist crap was tossed in the bin. We need to be looking to the future with our aim on the stars, not forever …

Like
brian
Dec 31, 2023
Replying to

I don’t think it is a case that if things are beneficial and providential then sensible people would wish to access them. For example the Chinese don’t adopt all western customs and vice versa. People become comfortable with what they know, are familiar with or have experienced. Regardless Maori and non-Maori are all just human, we just need to be more aware and receptive to each other’s cultures to get along better.

Edited
Like
bottom of page