top of page

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

Search

Lindsay Mitchell: New Zealand - No longer a secular state

An ODT opinion piece recently parodied the rapid adoption of Māori names for government departments. It drew attention to the renaming of the Earthquake Commission as Toka Tū Ake EQC which apparently "reflects the whakapapa of our nation." The name-change decision was made by the Minister and cabinet.

The Commission site contains a section about their new Māori name.

In the beginning, Ranginui (sky father) and Papatūānuku (earth mother) were joined in such a strong embrace it created darkness. When their sons separated them to create light, Ranginui grieved so much for Papatūānuku that his tears flooded the land. Their sons turned Papatūānuku over so their parents would not face each other and see each other’s sorrow.
Rūaumoko is the youngest, unborn son of Ranginui and Papatūānuku. He was turned toward the earth in his mother’s womb. His brothers gave him fire so he could warm himself in the darkness. Being so closely tied with his mother, Rūaumoko felt her pain at the separation. When he stirs, he expresses his anger through geothermal currents, earthquakes, and volcanic eruptions. As we live alongside Rūaumoko’s rumblings and Ranginui’s tears, EQC’s role is to help make our homes stronger, ensure new homes are built on better land, and provide support when damage occurs.

Are these characters any different to Adam and Eve? Creation myths sit at the basis of religious belief. Imagine then Christian biblical stories and imagery appearing on Ministry websites to explain their reason for being and values. It would not happen.

In a 2013 Otago University lecture Andrew Bradstock said:

"...there is a shared perception here that religion is principally for the private not the public domain. This was given a degree of official endorsement in July 2010 when a draft report on “Human Rights in New Zealand Today” was released by the Human Rights Commission. This carried a statement that “Matters of religion and belief are deemed to be a matter for the private, rather than the public, sphere.” The wording was subsequently changed following complaints (though the text is still on the HRC website), but it would be hard to dispute the claim that we generally feel more comfortable if individuals or organisations, when speaking publicly, refrain from parading openly any religious convictions they may have."

Doesn't the promotion of Māori mythology fall into the domain of parading religious convictions?


And it isn't just the Earthquake Commission.


The Reserve Bank postulates,

"How Tāne Mahuta can explain our financial system. Māori oral traditions tell us that Tāne Mahuta dug his shoulders into Papatuanuku (earth mother) and used his legs to push against Ranginui (sky father), separating them and letting the light into the world. With that light, Tāne Mahuta, guardian of the forest and birds, enabled life to thrive."

The Climate Change Commission explains its Māori name, He Pou a Rangi: Ingoa Māori:

"The simplest translation of He Pou a Rangi is 'a pillar of the sky'. The concept considers our role as upholders of the sky. We are honouring the sky and in turn, have a duty to care for it. Using 'He' Pou ('a' pillar) rather than 'Te' Pou ('the' pillar) recognises that we are one of many pou or organisations working together to address climate change. Pou can uphold, provide a point of connection, protect, and provide stability. In a te ao Māori view, pou provide a two-way connection, both upholding and uplifting what is above, but also connecting and grounding with what is below. Pou connect Ranginui, the sky father, to Papatūānuku, the earth mother."

There are many more examples occurring across various government websites and in the documents they generate. Law lecturer David Griffiths refers to, "...state concessions to indigenous Māori spirituality that are now commonplace in legislation and other governmental actions." That was sixteen years ago.

Ironically, and somewhat inexplicably, the developments have been accommodated by people who have no truck with Christianity - liberal atheists. The pace of change has accelerated under the woke left.

Back in 1996 Justice Heron argued 'the courts were “secular” institutions and he declared that “involving any person in a karakia against their personal wishes” was “insensitive and unacceptable” '.

Yet a recent meeting of state-employed health professionals with no Māori people in attendance still featured the obligatory karakia delivered by a non-Māori female. When asked why, the answer received was, "Their belief in equity." Was a Christian or any other prayer offered? No. So much for equity.


Just as people balk at the imposition of mythology to explain matters of science, there will be those discomfited by the routine practise of karakia (especially given the diversity of cultures and beliefs of those working within the New Zealand health system, which is almost entirely publicly run).

The solution is not to start offering sops to every other religious belief that exists in New Zealand. To put it crudely - two wrongs do not make a right.

The answer is to re-establish the traditional and necessary secularism of the state. In the United Kingdom where awareness and objection to the problem is more acute, an organisation has formed which maintains,

"Public services that are intended for the whole community, especially those funded by public money, should be provided in a secular context, open to all, without discriminating against anyone on grounds of religion/belief – either the people who are served or employed."

Amen to that - or whatever the secular equivalent is.




Lindsay Mitchell blogs here



4,205 views128 comments

128 commentaires


winder44
winder44
05 déc. 2022

I see the elite minority barking loudly about the refusal of Mayor Jepson from using his mayor privilege to prevent unwanted and unnecessary heathen rave in a Kaipara Council meeting.

Where do these get off. Using their so called culture as power weapons' against NZ society whom consist of a much, much larger group, many that are of Christian faith.

Sorry, but this has to stop, and stop now!

We are starting to become a joke in other countries that observe this carry on.

J'aime
JW
JW
13 déc. 2022
En réponse à

I'm not sure of the basis of your description of a karakia as a "heathen rave".


Karakia are traditional prayers or incantations, but with the introduction of Christianity to NZ in the 19th century, new karakia were written to acknowledge the Christian god.


If your objection is that protocols and customs should always reflect the dominant culture, you need to turn the clock back 50 years.

J'aime

I hope mayor Jepson has a sustained stance on no maori prayer before council meetngs.


Already, he is saying there is room for compromise.


Perhaps he has thought of a censure motion against him. If so, what then? The mayor apologising to the activist maori stirrer, allowing prayers and of course the mayor attending compulsory brainwashing for daring to defy maoridom from its sacred mission to introduce maori culture per local government’s TOW responsibilities to secular council work!

J'aime

Administrator
Administrator
02 déc. 2022

Newly elected Kaipara mayor Craig Jepson disallows a karakia on the grounds of secularism. Video here - https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/479814/newly-elected-kaipara-mayor-craig-jepson-shuts-down-councillor-s-karakia-request

J'aime
JW
JW
04 déc. 2022
En réponse à

His worship Mayor Jepson disallowed a karakia on the basis that he runs a secular meeting, without determining if the karakia was religious or not: many karakia are non religious. If he was disallowing it because he runs a council meeting that respects everyone, that excludes respecting Māori tikanga, yet he is okay with giving the European/NZ culture’s courtesy of welcoming everyone.


“The stronger a man is, the more gentle he can afford to be”

J'aime

Alice de Janze
Alice de Janze
02 déc. 2022

A learned and wise old white man had this to say, "it's all just a load of racist bollocks."

J'aime

winder44
winder44
02 déc. 2022

Hang on a bit.

Where does this come from. I have friends and family that live overseas, most if not all of them think the good old NZ is becoming a laughing stock with its attempt to force dual language on the population.

One friend recently here visiting, was totally confused when visiting a family member in hospital. Almost all information was in the Maori language, bold, and above smaller English wording.

It got worse when leaving the building, a police car pulled up beside the entrance with Maori wording almost the whole side of the vehicle.

In his opinion and shared by many of his friends it will be extremely detrimental to our tourism industries if this foreign …

J'aime
JW
JW
05 déc. 2022
En réponse à

NZ is mature enough to absorb another language. In fact there is precedence already when Māori began to take on the British colonists’ language, it didn’t turn the majority away from bothering to understand it. Quite the opposite.

J'aime
bottom of page