top of page

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!



Was Paul Henry correct when he questioned whether New Zealand is on the skids? It’s something we need to ask now that our migration figures show we lost huge numbers of people last year who have gone overseas for greener pastures. The grizzles from Wellington, and particularly from the wrongly-named Public Service Association about the departmental layoffs, verge on the bizarre. What do they expect when a grossly extravagant Labour government increased the size of the bureaucracy by one third in six short years, producing no discernible improvement to outputs? And the sight of hundreds of young people in the streets last weekend baying against the “Fast Track” legislation only adds to Paul Henry’s argument. Too many Kiwis seem no longer interested in policies aimed at growing the national pie: they just want to eat their diminishing slice now, and clear off overseas if they are still feeling hungry.

The intention of the Fast Track legislation before the House is to grow the pie. Its goal is to produce a process for quicker delivery of infrastructure and development projects with regional and national potential. The goal is to step up New Zealand’s economic growth. Planning legislation started in the 1920s and successive governments added to it, culminating in the Resource Management Act, 1991. Regulations became ever more complex, slowing the issue of consents for private and public developments. Over the last 30 years, many small RMA amendments have failed to speed up growth and chronic constipation set in as the planning process retarded new development. The Coalition government has come up with a relatively simple solution whereby applications to a handful of relevant ministers for a consent can be referred to a panel of experts to examine. If they deem the proposals worthy, and they don’t threaten Treaty settlements or other specified sacred cows, then the experts can, using their wisdom and experience, recommend back to ministers that consents be granted. The final decision rests with the ministers.

New Zealand’s economic growth has been lack-lustre now for the better part of twenty years. Australia, and other countries we have always benchmarked ourselves with are pushing ahead at a faster pace. Increasingly, we look like a quaint backwater rather than a country among the top five achievers that we were in the early 1950s. The Fast Track idea therefore deserves support.

But there are plenty of naysayers who know the value of everything and the real cost of nothing. They prefer bureaucrats in make-believe public service jobs, never thinking about the millions added to the deficit as a result. Worse, the naysayers have the media on their side. Radio NZ, the TV channels and the print media, especially the New Zealand Herald, are full time criticising the new government’s attempts to reel in unnecessary spending to reduce the national deficit. Which raises a key question relevant to Paul Henry’s question: education. Why are most Kiwi journalists these days economically illiterate? We know that school achievement levels in most areas have been sliding, but it appears that tertiary standards have also slipped, and that journalists arrive at their desks with little knowledge about what produces the income side of the government’s ledger. They know plenty about what they’d like to see ministers fund, but care little about where the money comes from. It’s “feeling good” and “being kind”, Jacinda Ardern’s mantras that spring quickly to their minds. As soon as a human interest story like the saga over funding cancer drugs emerges, or fixing our roads to expedite transport ahead of big additional funding for disability services, today’s journalists quickly lapse into feel-good mode.

The result of many years of failing to tackle the income side of the national ledger is that Grant Robertson left behind an additional debt of $90 billion which has taken our total debt to about 44% of our gross domestic product. That debt is having to be serviced at a time when interest rates are much higher than they were when Labour came to power in 2017. The Coalition faces tough choices. Mining for further oil, gas and minerals must be promoted, and when we see the list of schemes before the Fast Track Committee there will be lots of other potential solutions for our budgetary problems that will test our collective minds.

Whether we can face up to that challenge will be the answer to Paul Henry’s question. At my age I’d love to be optimistic, but I fear those migration statistics will continue, egged on unwittingly, by the educational failures that are daily on display in our media.

4,997 views168 comments


That Paul Henry's self-importance and Anglo-centric superiority coincides with those of ACT there can be little doubt. A match made in heaven one could say?

Was he paid to offer his opinions or were his convictions so sound that he offered his services pro-bono?


A bit of an aside -

Dismantling ‘kind’ Colonialism

“It’s a mythical kindness because it’s always conditional on us being submissive. As soon as we stop submitting to Crown authority, that kindness, as we are seeing now, disappears.” — Tina Ngata on ‘kind colonialism’.

The New Zealand government has never operated under the provisions of Te Tiriti. It has been operating under the provisions of the Doctrine of Discovery.

“Simply voting this government out will not change that because the doctrine is at the heart of the governmental system. It was set up to dispossess us from the beginning, and you can’t tweak that away.

A selfish lot in 1840 and now, are Maori. Particularly as there is now a…

Jun 16
Replying to

Apologies for this, once again from me - translated from an inscription on the grave of a Viking, "To be wounded by words is to be weak".

Obviously not a new problem.


Grant Robertson left behind an additional debt of $90 billion”

That’s the real challenge - weaning Kiwis off the ‘easy credit’ that they’ve become accustomed to.

Replying to

Weaning them off of their delusion of ENTITLEMENT is the big challenge.


Destroying NZ's economic future and underming the integrity of democracy with decolonisation and indigenisation of NZ as a facade towards socialist agenda

Disclaimer: I was requested to extend this subject that was posted previously so as to cover the wider political ramifications.

To understand where NZ is presently heading in a Maori centric economically disasterous way -both in terms of governance and a socialital way (unless the present coaliation government prevents it.); it is essential to realise that Maori governance and traditional values have significant similarities that resemble socialist frameworks.

The presently peaceful "movement" to transform NZ goverance and political structure is therefore in part a warped shift of democracy, governance and eventually sovereignty by cloaking the "movement" around Maori…

Replying to

What is this assumption, that living in primitive tribal societies was so great, based on? None of the people promoting this myth of the "noble savage" have ever experienced or understand what they are talking about. They are just making stuff up!

These "aspirational do-gooders", whose lives have been blessed with all the benefits and progress of Western Civilization, have no idea what they are talking about. Every one of us is a descendent of members of primitive tribes of hunters and gatherers whose lives were dangerous, cruel, deprived and usually rather short. Some of our ancestors moved on earlier than others to find practical and effective ways of living better. Then they helped people in other less advanced tribal cultures to live in…


Allow me to post a link to an 11 minutes debate, very relevant to Michael Bassett article here.

The subject is "The Twilight of the West". The discussion is between Os Guiness, James Orr, Dennis Prager and John Anderson (well-known Australian politician).

Replying to

Quote from the link posted - "Leadership defines reality"..... so where is NZ being lead? Its damn obvious as far as matters are presently playing out.

The reconciliation by Government with taxpayer funds today to try to reconcile ascribed historic colonialism injustices (making NZ a world which is now more anchored in the past).

History asserted by Maori academics (funded by Government) who are labelled now as champions of the indigenous and “bearers of truth”. They ought to be conceived as “provocateurs” who have a capacity to represent a one-sided version of the past. The past being dredged up under their academic research of history, further "expanded" from verbal Maori interviews on the basis of 'for Maori, with Maori, by…

bottom of page