top of page

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

Search

MICHAEL LAWS interviews MICHAEL BASSETT


ree


While titled "Dr Michael Bassett on State Care Abuse" other issues are traversed with an especially valuable discussion about the Treaty principles, their origin and subsequent evolution.


Unfortunately, only the first half of the interview is available at YouTube. To pick up the full 23 mins go to this link at The Platform

 
 
 

15 Comments


Peter Y
Peter Y
Aug 12, 2024

If you are against much of the race division nonsense that's been coming our way, make no mistake, our unmandated signing up to UNDRIP hasn't helped Take 30 seconds and do the right thing by putting your name to another commentator's petition. Don't moan at what's happening if YOU CAN'T BE BOTHERED!


https://petitions.parliament.nz/e982a931-bd61-4038-7232-08dc7903aaac


Thanks to tjalling.jonker


And do PASS IT ON.

Edited
Like
winder44
winder44
Aug 12, 2024
Replying to

Been there , done that, last month.

Like

zekewulfe
zekewulfe
Aug 12, 2024

FFS.... if Geoffrey Palmer inserted principles into the Treaty of Waitangi by stealth; principles that were in contradiction to those to begin with, and the insertion of those contradictory principles (by stealth) is also verified by Michael Basset ( having been there and witnessed it on the day )..... Just what the F... have all these dunderheads been debating for the last umpteen years.

Also, surely there must be transcripts from that duplicitous occasion still available.


Its a political con.... giving many useless two faced assholes the ability to occupy equally useless space in parliament, just something to base their miserable existence on.


Is it going to go away ?..... not on your sweet Nellie. For those on board it…

Edited
Like

farmerbraun
Aug 11, 2024

For what it's worth . . . .


"  . . . .the warning signs have always been there: an increasingly autocratic government, increasingly volatile and irrational political struggles, mounting debt, increased taxation, a declining economy and the removal of basic freedoms “for the greater good.”


In 1929, if you lived in the US, you might have just paid $2,735 for a new Packard Custom 8 Roadster – a means of showing off your recent gains in the stock market. A year later, you might well have offered it for sale for only $100, as, for all your previous price offers, there were no takers.

And you, like they, had been wiped out in the crash, and $100 meant the…


Edited
Like
charliecovkid7491
Aug 12, 2024
Replying to

Kenya , Rhodesia, UK , Ireland etc etc

Like

This comment was deleted.
Tiglath Pileser
Tiglath Pileser
Aug 12, 2024
Replying to

[And lovely to hear from you.!!!! ] This is a great forum... nearly all are intelligent and literate. I masquerade as Tiglath Pileser, who wrote in cuneiform, but we have crossed paths in church contexts too for some years.... Banned from FB years back..😎

Like

Bert
Aug 11, 2024

Starting from 12:50 on the video slider - at https://theplatform.kiwi/podcasts/episode/dr-michael-bassett-on-state-care-abuse


The clear indication is that Geoffrey Palmer inserted the Treaty clauses into legislation knowing full well there was uncertainty as to principles in doing so and dismissed the uncertainty as not important.


That uncertainty will undermine NZ's economic certainy.


The Treaty of Waitangi "uncertainty" as to its principles has econmic implications. It is well-known in legal circles that the pursuit of legal certainty is fundamental and essential for commerce and finance. That is directly at odds with the evolving and often contested nature of Treaty principles.


Uncertainty in the legal framework, particularly around property rights and resource management, can deter investment and hinder economic growth. The differing interpretations of the Treaty between Māori and…


Edited
Like
ron
ron
Aug 11, 2024
Replying to

Yes, certainly true the unbelievable nonsense babbled about the Treaty by those who are supposed to be responsible adult political leaders, Maori activists understandably, including the ridiculous "living document" claim, which is weak code for "never ending gravy train". Signing UNDRIP was another idiocy that you don't need to be a lawyer to quickly understand that it is contrary to the ToW (and therefore its "principles" as an act of"bad faith"?). Although with no legal imperative, effectively declaring that indigenous people, according to the UN's hijacked definition (which signing effectively endorses), should be self-determining.

Edited
Like

©2021 by Bassett, Brash & Hide. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page