Open letter to the NZ Herald
With regard to Michael Bassett's deleted column, "Racism on a grand scale," I note that you have persisted in displaying a response to it from Kelly Jensen. He or she claims:
"To begin with, Dr Bassett takes issue with the new Aotearoa New Zealand history curriculum, in particular that only one serious Pākeha academic has been involved in its design.Which begs the question, are Māori academics not serious? "
What Dr Bassett actually wrote was: "I sought from the Ministry of Education details about who was designing the curriculum. Back came the names of a couple of black arm band school teachers and a collection of Maori radicals. There were a couple of academics, both Maori. No serious Pakeha historian in sight."
It is clear that the claim is a misrepresentation yet, by removing the original text, you have allowed it to go unchallenged. Furthermore you continue to propagate it.
Unlike the original complainant who caused you to remove Dr Bassett's article, I am not going to threaten to take you to the Press Council simply because I disagree with views you have published. You have enough problems just trying to stay afloat.
At Bassett's site you can see the level of support he garners. Peter Williams traversed this business yesterday on his talk programme and again support was overwhelmingly in Bassett's corner. Even Chris Trotter has waded into the issue writing:
Have Granny’s readers really become “wokesters”?
Of course they haven’t! So how does Currie expect them to react to the news that the contributions of a respected conservative historian, commentator, and former senior cabinet minister, have been banned for expressing the view that: “All things derived from Europe, except our creature comforts, must be set aside as we are expected to embrace all things Maori. It won’t be long before the woke who are driving all of this insist on officially changing our country’s name.'
But that is not the point.
The point is the editorial bias displayed by upholding an unknown letter-writer's freedom of speech, but not Dr Bassett's, is against your own code of ethics which states,
"Balance - In areas of controversy or disagreement, a fair voice will be given to opposing views." A "fair voice" would be more than one.