PETER WILLIAMS: A Bold Economic Plan
- Administrator
- May 19
- 5 min read
But our cowardly politicians won’t bother
DISCLAIMER: I’m a supporter and small dollar donor to the Taxpayers Union (TPU), a former Board member and a host of their podcasts.
Because news editors probably think it’s boring, the state of our economy and what to do about it doesn’t get as much airtime or column space as it should.
But two recent podcasts - one with former Finance Minister Ruth Richardson and the other with economics professor Rob MacCulloch – tell me this country is in a financial state worse than 1984, the year David Lange’s Fourth Labour government began their radical reshaping of the country’s economy.
When Roger Douglas took office as Minister of Finance in July 1984 the ratio of the government’s debt to GDP was 29.6 percent.
Next month it will hit 45.1 percent or $192 billion dollars. The forecast is for it to be 47 percent in two years from now.
Those numbers make two things very obvious – we have to start spending less than we earn, and we have to start paying back our debt.
(The annual interest bill on the debt is $9 billion, three times more than the Defence Force budget.)
As in 1984 some serious economic surgery is required. The Taxpayer Union publication “A Pathway to Surplus: A plan to end waste and rebuild fiscal strength” lays out the blueprint.
Published today (May19), it’s twenty five pages of considered economic thinking and an explanation of how the Crown accounts can be returned to surplus, while at the same time paying back huge chunks of Core Crown debt during the next four years.
One idea – selling off the $75 billion assets of the New Zealand Superannuation Fund – is so radical it will just never see the light of day.
But let’s think about this. Why not? The Crown currently borrows to invest into the fund and it performs well. But reducing Core Crown Debt by $75 billion or 43 percent significantly reduces the annual outgoings in Crown interest, freeing up money for things a government should be doing in education and health.
This is essentially a philosophical debate. Do you want money in the bank for a rainy day or would you rather reduce your debt? It’s like asking anybody with a million dollar mortgage if they have $500,000 in the bank. If they have, their capital management is highly suspect. I’m no finance expert but I do know that paying off debt is the best investment you can ever make.
This TPU report then goes after the low hanging fruit which can be expunged quickly - like the Winter Energy Payment to pensioners. That’ll save $560 million this year and nearly $3 billion by 2029. In the same category are the Best Start baby benefits saving $1.7 billion during the next four years and the KiwiSaver tax credit which costs a billion dollars a year.
Then there’s the so called demographic Ministries and agencies like the Ministries for Women, Ethnic Affairs, Pacific Peoples and Maori Development. If they’re closed down and their work folded into other agencies the savings would be $2.4 billion in the next four years.
In the overall scheme of what’s required the savings from those schemes are small beer, albeit absolutely necessary. But this Taxpayer’s Union report is not afraid to address the big beast in the room: the country’s aging population and the cost we Baby Boomers (I’m 71) will impose on the nation in the next forty years.
Life expectancy has increased 12 years since the 1950s and will reach 89.7 for females and 87 for males in the next half century. By 2060 over a quarter of us will be aged 65 or more. That means fewer working age people supporting more elderly. The tax burden on them therefore has to be reduced. But how?
The TPU is in no doubt – the age of superannuation eligibility must go up, and the sooner the process starts the better. The report says it must go up to 67 and then be indexed to life expectancy after that.
We’ve done it before. The age went up from 60 to 61 in 1992 and then gradually to 65 between 1993 and 2001. The Bill English National government had a plan to start increasing the age in 2037, reaching 67 in 2040. Why wouldn’t a fiscally responsible Parliament reinstate at least that arrangement right now?
But this report also recommends that, as in Australia, individuals take far more responsibility for their retirement income. Therefore it suggests KiwiSaver become compulsory with a minimum 4 percent contribution from both employee and employer.
As well as the monster sell down of the NZ Super Fund, this report also cuts to the chase about a whole lot of other Crown assets which should be sold.
The remaining 51 percent Crown shareholdings in Meridian, Mercury and Genesis Energy, along with lines company Transpower could be worth at least $16 billion.
Then there’s the poorly performing NZ Post, the state farmer Pamu and the omnipresent poster child for a hopeless Crown asset, KiwiRail, that are all recommended to be put on the block too. The cash return from them would be close to inconsequential but at least they wouldn’t continue to be a burden on the Crown as poorly performing assets.
The medicine recommended in this TPU report is strong and the current Coalition Government leadership is unlikely to be influenced by it. Winston Peters is vehemently against both asset sales and the raising of the superannuation age so those ideas are going nowhere in the short term.
Labour politicians, having their tail constantly wagged by the socialists in the Greens and Te Pati Maori, won’t touch either of those issues either.
It’s all rather a depressing economic and fiscal outlook. Unless the Crown makes some serious efforts to pay off debt while spending less than they collect in taxes and other revenue, then this country is headed for really dire economic outcomes.
High debt levels present huge risks. We’re a small and not very diversified economy. A market downturn for our food commodity exports would make it more difficult to pay back debt, pushing up the cost of borrowing even more. And let’s not consider the impact another earthquake might have!
This week’s Budget is unlikely to present anything radical or earth shattering. The KiwiSaver tax credit might go, but so what? It’s the lowest of the low hanging apples.
A pre-Budget announcement giving even more money to Hollywood film studios to make movies here tells you all you need to know about the economic philosophies of Nicola Willis and Chris Luxon.
They’re timid and not prepared to face reality head-on. That can wait for some other government.
God help us.
Writer and broadcaster for half a century. Now watching from the sidelines. Subscribe to Peter William's Substack here
Comment on this article at https://x.com/BrashHide539
We must get a return on taxpayer-funded investments. E.g. Film and other subsidies or investments need to incorporate a return when profits are made. Also we have Kiwis living over seas and paying tax (if any) somewhere else who pop back for cheaper medical care or training, then simply head away again so some other country can benefit.
Why not let pensioners keep their NZ super when they migrate?
At least the NZ taxpayers won’t have to carry the medical costs incurred by those who leave permanently.
As well as other benefits including freeing up residential property.
Many would like to move off shore but don’t because of the loss of their superannuation.
Well the present lot had all of the warnings about their tax cuts as well as cancelling progress to completing the landlord deductions. Not necessarily a criticism, but they could have waited once they knew that things were as bad as now painted.
Peter's solution to NZs economic problems is correct and simple. An analogy is the household budget. If the household is over indebted and expenditure is excessive - to the point that the household is on the verge of insolvency - then the solution is to reduce debt, sell assets and reduce expenditure. This will be a painful process but the risk of ignoring the problem is much worse. Real pain and suffering will be experienced once the bailiffs arrive on the householders doorstep.
Hallelujah!