top of page

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

Search

PETER WILLIAMS: Is this really our country?

Separatist hiring practices at Parliament


The line on the official Parliament website is stark.


“Te ao Maori competencies and approaches are key considerations in our recruitment practices.”


This is not a stock exchange listed or privately held company, or a small or medium sized enterprise. It is the Parliamentary Service and the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives. They are the organisations which administer our Parliament to ensure its smooth operation in the interests of every citizen and resident of this nation.


Yet here, buried deep in an extraordinary document called “He Ao Takitaki: The stars that guide us” is a staff hiring policy which says that unless you have competencies in te ao Maori and an approach to life through te ao Maori you’re unlikely to get a job at Parliament.


It is discriminatory and therefore illegal.


Section 21 of the Human Rights Act prohibits discrimination on the grounds of, among other things, ethnic or national origins, race, religious belief or ethical belief.


That could hardly be clearer. Yet this recruitment policy disregards those four grounds completely.


Despite the Coalition Agreement between National and New Zealand First saying that a Cabinet Office circular will be issued “to all central government organisations that it is the Government’s expectation that public services should be prioritised on the basis of need not race” here is the most central of central government organisations prioritising Maori thinking as the key to getting a job at Parliament.


The Coalition Agreement between National and Act says exactly the same, adding that the Cabinet Office circular to all central government organisations would be issued within the first six months of Government.


If that was done then the Parliamentary Service and the Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives have ignored it.


Why ?


And what are the politicians going to do about it?


The He Ao Takitaki document makes for quite extraordinary reading to anyone with a secular outlook on life, and a belief system that all people are equal before the law and all have equal rights in our country.


Here’s a few quotes - bearing in mind much of this document is written in te reo.


One of the shared goals we have across the Parliamentary Service and the Office of the Clerk is to be a workplace where our people feel comfortable engaging with te reo Maori and tikanga Maori and have a solid understanding of te Tiriti o Waitangi.


While the Parliamentary Service and the Office of the Clerk are already doing lots of mahi in this space we acknowledge that we need to weave more of te ao Maori into who we are as organisations. This will benefit our people, our work, our relationships, our Parliament and the people of Aotearoa more generally.


He ao Takitaki has three focus areas: our people, our places and our relationships. These will become our guiding stars Matariki, Mahutonga and Te Atu a Maui who will help steer us on our journey. By focusing on our people, our places and our relationships we will set the course for future generations at Parliament to build on and continue this important Kaupapa. We acknowledge and understand there is no endpoint to ao Maori.


The document is filled with over twenty pages of such psycho-babble.


If it’s of any consolation, the United States has similar issues. But politicians there are doing something about it.


The new Assistant Attorney-General for the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice Harmeet Dhillon, a political appointment by Donald Trump, is probing the city of Chicago after Mayor Brandon Johnson proudly highlighted the number of appointed black officials in his administration. They include his three deputy mayors, his chief operations officer, budget director and senior advisor.


Ms Dhillon is also dealing with recalcitrant lawyers at the Department of Justice.


Between Trump’s inauguration in January and this month, an estimated 250 attorneys in the Civil Rights Division resigned.


“There were career lawyers there who were doing the same thing, no matter who is the president. Suddenly, their little fiefdom that had remained untouched, was suddenly having to be responsive to elections” she told the Tucker Carlson podcast.


Trump’s anti-discrimination and anti-DEI agenda had been the catalyst for hundreds of lawyers to quit. “They weren’t going to be able to do (their pet projects) the way they wanted” Dhillon said.


We need a Harmeet Dhillon-like politician or public servant to ensure the designated duration of He Ao Takitaki, which is 2022 to 2025, ends this year and is not renewed.

This country must offer equality of employment opportunity everywhere, especially at Parliament.


If te ao Maori competencies and approaches continue to be key considerations in recruitment practices at Parliament, and across the wider Public Service, I fear for the future of this land.


Writer and broadcaster for half a century. Now watching from the sidelines. Subscribe to Peter William's Substack here


Comment on this article at https://x.com/BrashHide539

 
 
 

46 Comments


Lawrence
Lawrence
4 days ago

Everything that TPM do is well considered and runs smoothly. Bypassing parliament means that they have a positive cultural image with the public.


When DS tried to debate the TPB, and TPM put on their protest, they had two victories. The first was pro forma. The Nats had said 'no' and were supported by NZF. Sadly, Act was outmanoeuvred. The lack of Parliamentary accountability shows they are not playing by Parliament's rules. Their positive rebel image is further consolidated.


there was a recent clip showing Debbie Ngarewa-Packer dispassionately taking the Nats apart. They can do the parliamentary work well enough when required. National could not. Luxon palmed off his inability to reply on an absent Nicola Willis. It was the…


Like

pat
May 25

I'm wondering if this blog is an echo chamber or are all of us representative of how the majority of New Zealanders feel now. I, too, suddenly feel disenfranchised having voted for change and got little in return. The budget was another example of tinkering around the edges when major, relatively painless, surgery was needed, Peter alluded to Donald Trump's success in the US: he had a mandate from 77m voters and he is keeping his word. The Nats and their leader are major disappointments (not delivering on promises) and I fear we will pay the price at the ballot box; New Zealand First rhetoric is on the money for me but we need more action. I'm impressed, mostly, with…

Like


Peter, look no further than your mate Peters.

The greatest charlatan New Zealand has ever seen promised us that one of NZ First’s acts would be to rid our country of the 27 references to the Treaty of Waitangi in legislation.

Eighteen months later not a single act has had this odious reference expunged.

Peters, Jones et al are blatant liars only interested in conning their aging, gullible supporters and retaining the baubles of office.

Despicable !

Like

foodnz
May 24

Are you reading this Sir Winston.? Shane Jones? Watching Shane Jones’ budget debate speeech was a joy. I feel that those two and David Seymour are our only politicians who are expressing their real feelings. The National causus seem to be tightly curbed. Why, why?

Like
winder44
winder44
May 25
Replying to

National is Probably looking to the next election, as having upset both ACT and

NZ First with their dilly-dallying woke actions, are now trying to cosy up to the maori party to get over the line without their current political partners.

Like

©2021 by Bassett, Brash & Hide. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page