Sex Quotas and Gender
- Rodney Hide
- Apr 19, 2021
- 1 min read
The Green Party's Constitution has left the Party marooned in 2012. The Party is now dated.
Section 9.2.1 specifies "two Leaders (one male, one female)". Oh the horror! The Greens are discriminatory. And worse, boringly binary. Only the cis-gendered may lead.
The Greens stand in stark contrast to all other parties: any member anywhere along the gender spectrum may lead the Labour Party, the National Party or the Act Party. Not so the Greens. The cis-gendered are specified. Only binaries need apply.
Newsroom reports that Green MP Chlöe Swarbrick sees value in constitutional change but she hasn’t made her own mind up about what that might look like.
“It could be a Te Tiriti-based model, or non-binary or trans, there’s so many options."
It's very exciting because non-binary and trans could be grafted to Te Tiriti in new and innovative ways. There's lots of options and endless possibilities.
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson views the cis-gender bias as very 2012: “I think there’s an overwhelming interrogation of the gender-stringent part of the leadership…Probably, we’re moving past that male/female binary.’’
We should all take note: the entire country has taken onboard sex and ethnic quotas as fair and reasonable and it's not at all clear where they will end. The Green's deliberations may well hold a clue.
The Greens are the epitome of racist and sexist.
They judge people by the colour of their skin, not the content of their character.
Have they learned NOTHING from the last century of human rights history?
Sooo... if they had a man as 1 leader, & a man who thought he was a woman as the other leader, would that not upset the women who think they are men?
Re: Green MP Chlöe Swarbrick's comment "......there’s so many options." It's ...."there are" NOT "there is". Learn English!
A wacky party with a wacky constitution Why do they think with less than 10% of the vote they have the control
Is it not illegal to advertise or offer an employment position which discriminates on the basis of gender? I guess while Party leaders are paid the term "employment" may be inaccurate.