top of page

Subscribe Form

Thanks for submitting!

Search

Statement from Rt Hon Helen Clark and Dr Don Brash: "Prime Minister is jeopardizing both New Zealand’s independent foreign policy and its economic security."

“Just one month after the New Zealand Government hosted the Chinese Premier in New Zealand, and with no hint of a major change in New Zealand foreign policy in the National Party’s election campaign last year, the Prime Minister’s comments to the Financial Times strongly suggest that he has abandoned New Zealand’s independent foreign policy”, said former Prime Minister Helen Clark and former Leader of the National Party Don Brash.

 

“In his interview with the Financial Times, the Prime Minister spoke of New Zealand defence assets being a “force multiplier” for Australia, the United States, and others; of completing a “status of visiting forces agreement” with the Philippines which would facilitate New Zealand making military deployments there; of boosting defence spending at a time when public spending is under pressure; and of continuing to “name and shame” China for alleged spying. He also asserted that New Zealand is “very open” to participating in the second pillar of AUKUS – a position which goes well beyond “exploring” options for engagement with it.

 

“These statements orient New Zealand towards being a full-fledged military ally of the United States, with the implication that New Zealand will increasingly be dragged into US-China competition, including militarily in the South China Sea. While the rhetoric from both sides is heightened, it must be noted that the US is demanding that China accept the presence of US naval forces in its vicinity in a way which the US itself would not for a moment accept if the boot were on the other foot.


“Does China spy on New Zealand?  Almost certainly, just as the US, the UK, and countless others, including New Zealand, spy on other countries. Is China the only country spying on New Zealand, and is it only governments that engage in spying? Almost certainly not. The obsessive focus on spying by China suggests an agenda going beyond alerting and equipping New Zealanders to better manage all relevant risks.


“China not only poses no military threat to New Zealand, but it is also by a very substantial margin our biggest export market – more than twice as important as an export market for New Zealand as the US is.

 

“New Zealand has a huge stake in maintaining a cordial relationship with China.  It will be difficult, if not impossible, to maintain such a relationship if the Government continues to align its positioning with that of the United States.

 

“New Zealand has for decades sought engagement with China and its inclusion in the international system. A policy of isolating China serves no one’s interests, and has major implications for New Zealand’s economic security.

 

“A better approach would be to follow the example of Singapore – friendly to both China and the US, but definitely not in a treaty relationship with either. The course which the New Zealand Government is now taking, with no electoral mandate for a radical change to foreign policy, carries huge risks to our country”, Helen Clark and Don Brash said.


Rt Hon Helen Clark and Dr Don Brash, 16 July, 2024


 
 
 

113 Comments


schon.paulo
Jul 21, 2024

I think Helen sees everything through old red tinged glasses these days and Don struggles to read the room as he always has. New Zealand from my understanding of Luxon's position is to stand against any country or regime that seeks to impose it's will through force on an independent free sovereign country.

The fact that we have decided to align with like minded countries in a partnership/agreement (due to this belief) is a logical step. An alliance of like minded countries. It also sends a clear message of lines that should not be crossed. Given the erratic nature of some countries in our region such as North Korea it makes logical sense. If China believes in that same …

Like

farmerbraun
Jul 20, 2024

"Vance wants the US to wind down its support for Ukraine so it could focus more on building up in the Asia Pacific and arming Taiwan.

The thing that we can control now is making it costly for [China] to invade Taiwan, and we’re not doing that because we’re sending all the damn weapons to Ukraine and not Taiwan,” he told the Times."

Like

This comment was deleted.
zekewulfe
zekewulfe
Jul 19, 2024
Replying to

Yep Baz. That is another way of putting it.


I bailed from NZ 30 odd years ago. The writing was on the wall even back then. My simple philosophy in doing so was I could not stand by and watch the inevitable destruction of my homeland. (they were beginning to sell off what already belonged to us) and who could forecast what was next. Now we know, down down down it went and finally Ardern to top it off. Now Luxon FFS.


Though here in Australia there are the same political creeps and ills as NZ ...

I had figured at least it would not be my country that was being bastardised by political dimwittedness in full view of us…


Edited
Like

This comment was deleted.
Tiglath Pileser
Tiglath Pileser
Jul 18, 2024
Replying to

digging her grave

Like

Octavian Augustus
Octavian Augustus
Jul 18, 2024

GandR Faulkner says "China does not have any regard for anyone’s interest but their own . They have proven this over and over. Non aligned countries can only continue to exist if they are armed to the teeth and have a high regard for there own independence."


Sorry, but this commenter must work at the US Embassy or similar, such is the myopia or the dishonesty behind this statement. If we replaced the word 'China' with the words 'the United States' in the above claim, we would then be accurately describing the actual global geopolitical dynamic as it has existed for the last 80 years. If we ever ended up with a US military base on our shores then, just…

Edited
Like

©2021 by Bassett, Brash & Hide. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page